Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:39:02 +0100 From: Marko Cuk <cuk@cuk.nu> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tun and ALTQ Message-ID: <4370AA76.8000309@cuk.nu> In-Reply-To: <20051108013645.GE37350@green.homeunix.org> References: <436FDC90.3020108@cuk.nu> <20051108013645.GE37350@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that it work. Thanks.
Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q) you should specify "em", for "tun", vice
versa... what a mess, hehe.
Cuk
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:00:32AM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote:
>
>
>>Resend...
>>
>>Please, does anyone have any ideas...
>>
>>
>>What is the status of the tun0 driver and ALTQ ?
>>I have FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and have tried it without success. Why 6.0 ?
>>Don't know... curious maybe... if you think, that 5.4 will work better,
>>I'll reinstall it.
>>
>>The tun0 is because od xDSL ( PPPoE )
>>
>>It seems like packets won't match queue. Look at the pfctl output ( look
>>at the "bucy" rules -- he is a huge consumer and the primary uplink is
>>out for a week, xDSL is only backup and he consumes all the avail
>>bandwidth )
>>
>>
>>THIS IFACE IS TUN0 ( pppoe )
>>queue root_em0 bandwidth 1Gb priority 0 cbq( wrr root ) {std_ext, bucy_out}
>>[ pkts: 76053 bytes: 7390221 dropped pkts: 0 bytes:
>>0 ]
>>[ qlength: 0/ 50 borrows: 0 suspends: 0 ]
>>[ measured: 199.0 packets/s, 146.71Kb/s ]
>>
>>
>
>No it isn't, it's em0. You probably want to be using ALTQ on tun0.
>I've done it; it works....
>
>
>
--
NetInet d.o.o. http://www.NetInet.si
Private: http://cuk.nu
MountainBikeSlovenia team: http://mtb.si
Slovenian FreeBSD mirror admin http://www2.si.freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4370AA76.8000309>