Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:48:35 +0200 From: Marcin Jessa <lists@yazzy.org> To: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org>, Paul.Hampson@PObox.com (Paul Hampson), "Alan DeKok" <aland@ox.org> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, edgars@mikrotik.com, normunds@mikrotik.com, freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Subject: Re: Radius server with web/gui interface Message-ID: <20050616114835.7ff9342d.lists@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <20050616080134.GA10529@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <a64c109e05061423266dad8f00@mail.gmail.com> <42B0F729.80703@netxp.com.au> <a64c109e05061521047adf549d@mail.gmail.com> <20050616094503.3fd09a8d.lists@yazzy.org> <20050616080134.GA10529@heff.fud.org.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:01:34 +1200 Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:45:03AM +0200, Marcin Jessa wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:04:24 +0300 > > Abu Khaled <khaled.abu@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 6/16/05, phil grainger <lists@netxp.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > > you can mod the icradius cgi interface to work with freeradius, > > > > works fine. > > > > > > > > > > Very interesting. How much modification is required? > > > When it comes to setting up a icradius/freeradius, mysql and apache > > > then I can do it. I know only the basics of c/perl/php/... (Just how > > > to write a Hello World and sometimes I need help writing one), so any > > > help is appreciated > > > > > > > I thought you didnt want to run freeradius becouse of the security issues. > > And now all the sudden it became secure becouse of a different web interface? > > And dialupadmin would work fine, you dont need to recode interface of icradius. > > Email thompsa@FreeBSD.org and ask him if he's working on new port of freeradius 1.0.3. > > If not, I can do that. > > Ive been aware of 1.0.3 for a week now but it has known bugs. > > "06 June, 2005: Minor problems in version 1.0.3 mean that we will be > releasing 1.0.4 in a day or so. Please wait until then to upgrade." > > 1.0.4 was meant to be out by now and I have it confirmed that will be > only a few more hours. It will be updated as soon as its out. > Is there a way you could include a new dictionary.mikrotik as a patch for the port? And add it as $INCLUDE dictionary.mikrotik in the dictionary file? I suppose it will not make it to the 1.0.4 release (Paul, Alan?). The old one is inaccurate. Here is the new dictionary.mikrotik : # http://www.mikrotik.com # # http://www.mikrotik.com/Documentation/manual_2.8/dictionary.mikrotik # VENDOR Mikrotik 14988 ATTRIBUTE Recv-Limit 1 integer Mikrotik ATTRIBUTE Xmit-Limit 2 integer Mikrotik ATTRIBUTE Mikrotik-Group 3 string Mikrotik ATTRIBUTE Wireless-Forward 4 integer Mikrotik ATTRIBUTE Wireless-Skip-Dot1x 5 integer Mikrotik ATTRIBUTE Wireless-Enc-Algo 6 integer Mikrotik ATTRIBUTE Wireless-Enc-Key 7 string Mikrotik ATTRIBUTE Rate-Limit 8 string Mikrotik ATTRIBUTE Mikrotik-Realm 9 string Mikrotik # MikroTik Values VALUE Wireless-Enc-Algo No-encryption 0 VALUE Wireless-Enc-Algo 40-bit-WEP 1 VALUE Wireless-Enc-Algo 104-bit-WEP 2 Cheers, Marcin P.S The dictionary file on mikrotik's website is inaccurate as well. The realm and group values are not changed to match the current ones even tho I asked them to correct that.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050616114835.7ff9342d.lists>