Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:58:18 +1300 From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> To: mdf@FreeBSD.org Cc: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: make tinderbox failures Message-ID: <20121030205818.784c1bf1@fubar.geek.nz> In-Reply-To: <CAMBSHm-MiWMwWae1zyJ=E1pUK1040uga4_X37-nqX25jVFkOTg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAMBSHm9CE3ZQ9oEb40EwwZzFg%2BRZj=hhwLqd%2BdhcgwNsBNnf2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGH67wQ%2BGmNnFKchOb6GXah-NfJjEdqOmWztcy4EVOaLssM6zA@mail.gmail.com> <29E39FE3-57CC-484C-8966-2F33A7A63C89@bsdimp.com> <CAMBSHm-MiWMwWae1zyJ=E1pUK1040uga4_X37-nqX25jVFkOTg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:31:50 -0700 mdf@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Thanks for fixes! Is the reason the public tinderbox didn't see these > because it has explicit lists of arch/CONF kernels to build, while > "make tinderbox" on my machine just builds all the capitalized files > as configuration files? I don't know about the MIPS builds but with ARM it is because the tinderbox only builds for TARGET_ARCH=arm. 2 months ago I updated the ARM configs to set their machine option correctly. This meant the kernels sere built with the correct toolchain in "make tinderbox" but not the public tinderbox. The correct fix is to update the public tinderbox to build arm, armv6 and armeb. Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121030205818.784c1bf1>