Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:51:10 +0100
From:      "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk>
To:        delphij@delphij.net
Cc:        Stanislaw Halik <weirdo@tehran.lain.pl>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Easy DoS
Message-ID:  <20051218125110.GC860@zaphod.nitro.dk>
In-Reply-To: <a78074950512180430y1908dd95jf201c4ab7dbaeb64@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20051216133448.GA10382@beastie.creo.hu> <20051216151016.GE84442@deviant.zoral.local> <a78074950512161033r58ca7c87ycfb97e0b38d64756@mail.gmail.com> <20051218084541.GA54909@tehran.lain.pl> <20051218105421.GB860@zaphod.nitro.dk> <a78074950512180430y1908dd95jf201c4ab7dbaeb64@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2005.12.18 20:30:31 +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Hi, Simon,
>=20
> On 12/18/05, Simon L. Nielsen <simon@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On 2005.12.18 09:45:41 +0100, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
> > > Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Patch looks good so I have committed it as sys/kern/sys_pipe.c,v
> > > > 1.185.  Thanks for the submission!
> > >
> > > any chances on getting a fast backport to RELENG_6_0?
> >
> > For that to happen it need to be in RELENG_6 for a while to make sure
> > nothing is broken by the change and then an Errata Notice has to be
> > made for the issue.  That said, it sounds like a good candidate for an
> > Errata Notice.
>=20
> Do we typically issue Errata Notice for local DoS in the past?  I
> think this is a serious problem, but not very sure whether it should
> be merged back to RELENG_6_0, though.  If so@ and re@ agrees I would
> be happy to do some documentary work for the Errata Notice :-)

I'm can't remember if we have actually done any Errata's for local DoS
issues, but it has been discussed a few times between so@ and re@ and
the general agreement has been that it is a good idea.

I know there was at least one other local DoS issue for 6.0 that has
been proposed as an Errata, but I don't know the status of it.

--=20
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD Deputy Security Officer

--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDpVs+h9pcDSc1mlERAjJJAJ9XVS1sBo4gCF6u4b27VqrM3I9RhgCfeRXx
pwKbqsP+LEcjDYvVIxObjGk=
=xAXE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051218125110.GC860>