Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:29:31 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports usable or not [was: flowtable usable or not] Message-ID: <4F51118B.40800@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120302164505.GA1500@lonesome.com> References: <18c325310044439cbc4d03c7e0bbec52@dizum.com> <20120302164505.GA1500@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 02/03/2012 16:45, Mark Linimon wrote: >> Other ports aren't supported on certain target architectures but the build >> > doesn't tell you that until after it has run for a couple of hours > Those are also bugs. Please send PRs for those, as well. I am particularly > concerned about amd64 in this regard (although I am actually only myself > doing the package runs for sparc64 and powerpc). We continually try to > adjust the metadata for ports to indicate where they will and will not > run, based on the output of pointyhat runs. (OTOH pointyhat runs the > src tree from "the oldest supported minor release on each branch", so > this may be a clue .) Which reminds me about this: ports/164638 I've kind of taken my eye of progress on that, being distracted by other things. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9REZUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwLOACdGTJhuNVT593LbhbA/I1h3MOa 9LoAnjrmHsmI51f5scR4lJBZTLf4/kQb =iR4R -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F51118B.40800>