Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 12:06:07 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> Cc: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org>, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-vendor@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r300961 - vendor/one-true-awk/dist Message-ID: <201605291906.u4TJ67AT082836@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> of "Sun, 29 May 2016 11:17:49 -0700." <201605291817.u4TIHnN7040344@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <201605291817.u4TIHnN7040344@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert writes: > In message <574B2EAC.3010908@FreeBSD.org>, Pedro Giffuni writes: > > > > > > > > On 29/05/2016 12:37, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > In message <201605291618.u4TGItNJ024583@repo.freebsd.org>, "Pedro F. > > > Giffuni" w > > > rites: > > >> Author: pfg > > >> Date: Sun May 29 16:18:55 2016 > > >> New Revision: 300961 > > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300961 > > >> > > >> Log: > > >> one-true-awk: replace 0 with NULL for pointers > > >> > > >> Also remove a redundant semicolon. > > >> Submitted upstream already. > > >> > > >> Modified: > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/b.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/lex.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/maketab.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/parse.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/run.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/tran.c > > >> > > > Was this commit and r300962 obtained from the upline or vendor or were > > > these commits local to FreeBSD only? > > > > > > > > There is no public awk public repository AFAICT, but bwk acknowledged > > the submission. > > > > The change to openresolv was merged to the public repository. > > As they've acknowledged the submissions, can you please tag the new > versions of awk and openresolve with the correct upstream version numbers, > please? Additionally, if there are no new version numbers, what reason is there for polluting the vendor branch with local patches to it? Is not the vendor branch for virgin code retrieved (or received) from the vendor (or upline)? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> or <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201605291906.u4TJ67AT082836>