Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:33:07 -0800
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: GEOM_PART: a quick update on logical partitions
Message-ID:  <4988F053.3060709@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730902031536h5ec406b3h5e375cfdf9f4abc7@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <FCA8C5E4-BC41-4711-9EBC-CD692144F6B8@mac.com>	 <20090203082153.565746e2@zelda.local>	 <b649e5e0902030357k7508b4e7kc69c31a354b3e077@mail.gmail.com>	 <gm9fh1$4el$1@ger.gmane.org> <4988C908.1030002@FreeBSD.org> <9bbcef730902031536h5ec406b3h5e375cfdf9f4abc7@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras wrote:
> 2009/2/3 Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>:
>> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> Marius NĂ¼nnerich wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not happy with the symlinks either. When someone is manipulating a
>>>> partition table she should be able to live with the consequences. I
>>>> would rather go for the UUID in UFS header approach if there is enough
>>>> room. BTW I implemented GPT UUID glabels a while ago please see:
>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128398
>>> I have a patch for UFS "GUID" labels (not exactly GUIDs, but every UFS
>>> file system has a reasonably unique ID associated with it) but have
>>> encountered what seems a bug in GEOM slicers - two dev entries pointing
>>> to the same device don't work well with orphaning/tasting. Have you
>>> encountered something similar perhaps?
>> Why exactly do we need UFS "GUID" labels, when we already have GEOM_LABEL,
>> which works just fine with UFS.
> 
> So people don't need to make up dummy labels for dozens of file systems :)
> 
> Also, "UFS GUIDs" are always present, even in root file systems
> created by sysinstall by default. It's a good idea.

sysinstall can auto-generate labels and use them to generate fstab, 
right now it leaves UFS label empty anyway. This should cover 99.99% of 
all cases. I just worried that instead of one labeling scheme we would 
end up with 10, neither of which is really well supported.

-Maxim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4988F053.3060709>