Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:32:35 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal.... Message-ID: <fsotd4$dpk$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20080330161702.GA8242@FS.denninger.net> References: <20080330031017.GA32063@FS.denninger.net> <20080330090617.GH95731@elvis.mu.org> <20080330161702.GA8242@FS.denninger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig34FC2BB8B7F301423087891D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Karl Denninger wrote: > Is there a performance advantage to using gjournal over a "normal" UFS/= UFS2 > filesystem with softupdates? Short answer - no. Long answer - maybe, in very specific scenarios which = are probably not possible in real world usage. For PostgreSQL and similar advanced databases that do their own=20 journaling (WAL), it generally doesn't make sense to add another layer=20 of journaling. --------------enig34FC2BB8B7F301423087891D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH7/jjldnAQVacBcgRAm7MAKDL4/aMRzLrPWncqtxH1ZbI44esVgCg1pz4 EjZ48xQESDjgDlnL81VVVR0= =Io1r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig34FC2BB8B7F301423087891D--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fsotd4$dpk$1>