Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:32:35 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal.... Message-ID: <fsotd4$dpk$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20080330161702.GA8242@FS.denninger.net> References: <20080330031017.GA32063@FS.denninger.net> <20080330090617.GH95731@elvis.mu.org> <20080330161702.GA8242@FS.denninger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Karl Denninger wrote: > Is there a performance advantage to using gjournal over a "normal" UFS/UFS2 > filesystem with softupdates? Short answer - no. Long answer - maybe, in very specific scenarios which are probably not possible in real world usage. For PostgreSQL and similar advanced databases that do their own journaling (WAL), it generally doesn't make sense to add another layer of journaling. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH7/jjldnAQVacBcgRAm7MAKDL4/aMRzLrPWncqtxH1ZbI44esVgCg1pz4 EjZ48xQESDjgDlnL81VVVR0= =Io1r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fsotd4$dpk$1>