Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:00:05 GMT
From:      Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
To:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: misc/118249: moving a directory changes its mtime
Message-ID:  <200711260700.lAQ705ue012439@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/118249; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
To: Joe Peterson <lavajoe@gentoo.org>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: misc/118249: moving a directory changes its mtime
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:54:12 +1100 (EST)

 On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Joe Peterson wrote:
 
 >> Description:
 > Moving a directory to a different directory changes its "mtime".  This behavior seems odd compared with other "Unix" systems (tried on Mac OS X and Linux).  Also, moving a file to a different directory does *not* change its mtime, making this behavior inconsistent.  Also, it is not typically desirable to touch mtime simply by being moved, which loses track of the last time the dir's contents were actually changed.
 
 Please use line much shorter than 417 characters.
 
 >> How-To-Repeat:
 > mkdir a b
 > (check timestamps using stat or "ls -ld" and "ls -lcd")
 > mv b a
 > (check timestamps again)
 >
 > Both "a" and "b" will now have new mtime and ctime).  It is expected that "a" will have a new mtime and ctime, but only the ctime on "b" should have changed.
 
 b's contents did change -- its ".." entry moved.  However, POSIX only
 requires marking for update the ctime and mtime of the parent directory
 for each file (only upon successful completion).  I've been running
 regression tests on timestamps for rename() for more than 15 years and
 am surprised that they don't notice this bug.
 
 The (mis)implementation of marking for update the ctime and mtime of the
 moved directory seems to be just to call some function (probably
 ufs_direnter()) which does the marking.  ufs_rename() only sets IN_CHANGE
 and IN_RENAME directly.
 
 ufs_rename() has a related bug on unsuccessful completion.  It
 unnecessarily marks IN_CHANGE near its beginning, long before successful
 completion, so rename() usually clobbers ctimes on failure.  This is
 easy to fix by setting the correct flag for marking inode modifications
 (IN_MODIFIED).  (IN_CHANGE used to mean inode-modified, but is now just
 the ctime update mark, apart from this and some similar bugs.)  With
 this fix, there are no direct settings of IN_CHANGE left in ufs_rename().
 According to my notes, ufs_direnter() and ufs)dirremove are resposible
 for marking all the necessary updates, and they have the same bug of
 doing this before successful completion.  My regression tests haven't
 reported any failures from them but I think failures can occur for
 disk-full and I/O errors and the former is easy to test.
 
 mv across file systems clobbers directory times and much more (links...).
 
 Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200711260700.lAQ705ue012439>