Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:04:06 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net>, drvince@anonymnet.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nullfs fixed ? (was: More into /etc/rc.d/jail) Message-ID: <20050809220406.GB89909@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050809214748.GA45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <N1-uLBXxM-zn8@Safe-mail.net> <200508092335.21889@harrymail> <20050809214748.GA45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:47:48PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, > > > And you don't suffer from a big disk performance degradation with that? > > If you don't have I/O load it doesn't matter but I need usual I/O > > performance so I give each jail its own partition (GPT partitions). > > But I think some good guys are looking for fixing the performance issue > > like they already solved the nullfs problem :) Thanks again for that! > > (Jeff?) > > Are you sure that nullfs has been fixed ? In this case, the warning > at the end of mount_nullfs(8) manpage should be removed. nullfs seems to work fine on 5.x and above, at least for r/o usage. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC+ShVWry0BWjoQKURAnyhAJsFZwYOguzs9Ljpr58h9xInHX63bACeOEez /zcW3nbQ6SEXiHVfQXnaQTA= =V49B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050809220406.GB89909>