Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 06:49:56 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick Makefile ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/files md5 ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/patches patch-aa ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <19980822064956.A11014@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <19980822063125.A6226@nagual.pp.ru>; from ache@nagual.pp.ru on Sat, Aug 22, 1998 at 06:31:26AM %2B0400 References: <19980821171809.A29371@nagual.pp.ru> <199808220129.SAA13381@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19980822063125.A6226@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 22, 1998 at 06:31:26AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > It's still up to the maintainer. I almost never override the > > maintainer's decision to delete or keep a port. At least not with > > good reason. > > We can't keep it because it is duplicated in ImageMagick. > It was the reason for delete. > If you ever attempt to keep it, you'll got version mismatch in near > future, since both ports overwrite the same files. > > > Besides, it is just plain rude to delete the port without at least > > asking the maintainer first. > > Is it not rude to duplicate the port first without asking the maintainer? > If we say A, the we need to say B, instead lots of junk files and version > mismatch occurse. I not say A, I just say B. In any case we have a possibility to discuss this issue with maintainers _before_ deletion occurse if you explain your point of view as answer on my request instead of simple ignoring it. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980822064956.A11014>