Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:16:35 +0300 From: "Penerdzhy R.V." <prv0@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 8 Message-ID: <1576425481.20050303111635@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050303080956.9829B16A56C@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050303080956.9829B16A56C@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Здравствуйте, freebsd-stable-request. Вы писали 3 марта 2005 г., 11:09:56: fsrfo> Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to fsrfo> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit fsrfo> fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable fsrfo> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fsrfo> freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org fsrfo> You can reach the person managing the list at fsrfo> freebsd-stable-owner@freebsd.org fsrfo> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific fsrfo> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..." fsrfo> Today's Topics: fsrfo> 1. Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for FreebBSD fsrfo> 4.10 (Artem Kuchin) fsrfo> 2. Re: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ? (Art Mason) fsrfo> 3. 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Thomas Krause) fsrfo> 4. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Scot Hetzel) fsrfo> 5. Re: "ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted" from "boot0cfg fsrfo> -s 1" (Doug Ambrisko) fsrfo> 6. Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 (M. Warner Losh) fsrfo> 7. Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 (M. Warner Losh) fsrfo> 8. Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 (M. Warner Losh) fsrfo> 9. Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 (Ruslan Ermilov) fsrfo> 10. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Colin Percival) fsrfo> 11. Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo> (Freddie Cash) fsrfo> 12. ueagle(4) driver merging (Mateusz J?drasik) fsrfo> 13. Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo> (Peter Jeremy) fsrfo> 14. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Brian Behlendorf) fsrfo> 15. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Kevin Oberman) fsrfo> 16. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Kevin Oberman) fsrfo> 17. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Daniel Eischen) fsrfo> 18. Re: ueagle(4) driver merging (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo> 19. Re: ueagle(4) driver merging (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo> 20. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Brian Behlendorf) fsrfo> 21. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Daniel Eischen) fsrfo> 22. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Pete French) fsrfo> 23. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Eric Schuele) fsrfo> 24. Dual booting with Windows XP (Didier Caamano) fsrfo> 25. 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) (Edwin Brown) fsrfo> 26. Re: Crash when PREEMPTION enabled (Kris Kennaway) fsrfo> 27. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo> (Michael C. Shultz) fsrfo> 28. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo> (Edwin Brown) fsrfo> 29. ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila) fsrfo> 30. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo> (Edwin Brown) fsrfo> 31. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo> (Michael C. Shultz) fsrfo> 32. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo> FreebBSD 4.10 (pete wright) fsrfo> 33. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo> 34. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo> 35. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila) fsrfo> 36. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (pcasidy@casidy.com) fsrfo> 37. -PRErelease and ACPI: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA (Emanuel Strobl) fsrfo> 38. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor) fsrfo> 39. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila) fsrfo> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- fsrfo> Message: 1 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300 fsrfo> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo> Subject: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for FreebBSD fsrfo> 4.10 fsrfo> To: "FreeBSD Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Message-ID: <024601c51f33$eda69e40$0c00a8c0@artem> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; fsrfo> reply-type=original fsrfo> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) fsrfo> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? fsrfo> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE fsrfo> driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure). fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Regards, fsrfo> Artem Kuchin fsrfo> IT Legion Ltd. fsrfo> Moscow, Russia fsrfo> www.itlegion.ru fsrfo> matrix@itlegion.ru fsrfo> +7 095 232-0338 fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 2 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:25:40 -0600 fsrfo> From: Art Mason <amason@rackspace.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ? fsrfo> To: Vinny Abello <vinny@tellurian.com> fsrfo> Cc: Kipp Holger <h.kipp@eurowings.com> fsrfo> Message-ID: <4225CCE4.3080304@rackspace.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo> Yeah, I cam across that on some mailing list archives, but saw some fsrfo> additional references that this can cause issues with the amr driver. fsrfo> Have you experienced any instability issues with the amr driver and PAE fsrfo> enabled? If not, then I'll give this a shot on one of our lab boxes for fsrfo> testing. Thanks for the suggestion, BTW. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Art Mason fsrfo> Technical Support - Team F fsrfo> Rackspace Managed Hosting fsrfo> (800) 961-4454 ext. 4290 fsrfo> amason@rackspace.com fsrfo> Vinny Abello wrote: >> FYI, the architecture of the 2850 (assuming it is similar to your 2800) >> requires that you enable PAE support in your kernel of whatever OS you >> run to address the full 4GB of RAM. This is due in some part because of >> the memory mapping that was done for the PCI express bus and/or onboard >> Perc controller (per Dell tech support). We've run into this with all of >> our 2850's with various OS's and enabling PAE (per Dell's advice) fixes it. >> >> At 05:50 PM 3/1/2005, Art Mason wrote: >> >>> Indeed, just installed on a customer's server last night, and I build >>> SMP support into the GENERIC kernel this morning. Only issues I >>> encountered has to do w/ recognizing the full 4GB of RAM, but this >>> apparently has some compatibility issues w/ the amr driver. >>> As per Holger's comments about disabling USB in BIOS, this is a good >>> suggestion, since the DRAC apparently causes some IRQ issues w/ the >>> PS/2 keyboard controller, or something along those lines. Regardless, >>> these 2850 boxes are stupid fast, and I'm looking forward to >>> benchmarking 5.3 on them. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Art Mason >>> Technical Support - Team F >>> Rackspace Managed Hosting >>> (800) 961-4454 ext. 4290 >>> amason@rackspace.com >>> >>> >>> Kipp Holger wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue 01.03.2005 17:49, lhmwzy wrote: >>>> Please reply to hk at alogis dot com. This is not my native >>>> account. >>>> >>>>> Subject: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes >>>> >>>>> Anybody did this? >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>>> Any help is appreciateed? >>>> >>>> >>>> Boot from FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-CD and install. No problems >>>> so far. You might want to disable USB within BIOS, though, >>>> because they seem to be shared with other critical devices >>>> (nics and raidcontroller). But I don't use USB anyway. >>>> Then you might want to upgrade to 5-STABLE. >>>> This is on Dell PowerEdge 2800 with 2GB ECC RAM, >>>> 4 x 36GB SCSI and amrd-Controller (PERC-4-something). >>>> Binary copy of SAP 4.6C and Oracle 8 (from a working >>>> installation on FreeBSD 4.x) works nearly without changes >>>> (using emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 and one additional >>>> rpm (some compatibility-thing)). >>>> Regards, >>>> Holger Kipp >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> Vinny Abello >> Network Engineer >> Server Management >> vinny@tellurian.com >> (973)300-9211 x 125 >> (973)940-6125 (Direct) >> PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A >> >> Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection >> http://www.tellurian.com (888)TELLURIAN >> >> "Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear" >> -- Mark Twain >> >> >> fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 3 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET) fsrfo> From: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo> Subject: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: fsrfo> <2481.212.78.101.51.1109776024.squirrel@mta.webmatic.de> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 fsrfo> Hello, fsrfo> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: fsrfo> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp fsrfo> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd fsrfo> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift fsrfo> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd fsrfo> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift fsrfo> gate:/ # ntpq ntpq>> peers fsrfo> No association ID's returned fsrfo> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine: fsrfo> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart fsrfo> Stopping ntpd. fsrfo> Starting ntpd. fsrfo> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp fsrfo> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd fsrfo> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift fsrfo> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. fsrfo> Kind regards, fsrfo> Thomas. fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 4 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:53:59 -0600 fsrfo> From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo> To: Thomas Krause <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <790a9fff05030207536d59cb17@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET), Thomas Krause fsrfo> <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> wrote: >> Hello, >> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >> >> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd >> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >> >> gate:/ # ntpq >> ntpq> peers >> No association ID's returned >> >> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine: >> >> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart >> Stopping ntpd. >> Starting ntpd. >> >> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >> >> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. >> fsrfo> It could be that you have 2 scripts that are starting ntpd, check your fsrfo> rc.d directories: fsrfo> grep ntp /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* fsrfo> Scot fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 5 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:09:22 -0800 (PST) fsrfo> From: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: "ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted" from "boot0cfg fsrfo> -s 1" fsrfo> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> fsrfo> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503021609.j22G9MN3041308@ambrisko.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> David Wolfskill writes: fsrfo> | freebeast(5.4-P)[1] sudo boot0cfg -s 1 -v ad0 fsrfo> | Password: fsrfo> | boot0cfg: /dev/ad0: ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted fsrfo> | freebeast(5.4-P)[2] fsrfo> You might try: fsrfo> sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 fsrfo> Doug A. fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 6 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:13:22 -0700 (MST) fsrfo> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 fsrfo> To: veldy@veldy.net fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050302.091322.112684861.imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo> In message: <421DE027.70204@veldy.net> fsrfo> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> writes: fsrfo> : Right away ... first thing! fsrfo> : fsrfo> : fsrfo> -------------------------------------------------------------- : >>>> Installing everything fsrfo> : fsrfo> -------------------------------------------------------------- fsrfo> : cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install : ===>> share/info fsrfo> : install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir : ===>> include fsrfo> : creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh fsrfo> : touch: not found fsrfo> You have one of the canonical problems: fsrfo> (1) Time skew between building machine and installing machine fsrfo> (2) The path to the sources isn't exactly identical, in its canonical fsrfo> form, between building machine and installing machine fsrfo> (3) MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is different between building and installing. fsrfo> Warner fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 7 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:14:15 -0700 (MST) fsrfo> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 fsrfo> To: sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050302.091415.101560664.imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo> In message: <20050224145622.GE261@cowbert.2y.net> fsrfo> "Peter C. Lai" <sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net> writes: fsrfo> : Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to fsrfo> : build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but fsrfo> : I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need fsrfo> : da and of course, umass. fsrfo> cd src/sys/modules/umass ; make all install clean fsrfo> This assumes that the sources match what's on the system. fsrfo> Warner fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 8 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:15:16 -0700 (MST) fsrfo> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 fsrfo> To: sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net fsrfo> Cc: swhetzel@gmail.com fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050302.091516.51358208.imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo> In message: <20050224161305.GG261@cowbert.2y.net> fsrfo> "Peter C. Lai" <sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net> writes: fsrfo> : On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: : >> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:56:22 -0500, Peter C. Lai : >> <sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net> wrote: : >> > Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to : >> > build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but : >> > I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need : >> > da and of course, umass. : >> > : >> : >> Yes you can build modules seperately from a kernel build : >> : >> cd /usr/src/sys/modules/umass : >> make obj : >> make : >> make install : >> : >> Scot fsrfo> : fsrfo> : ok. what about da? i don't have that in my kernel, even though i have scbus. fsrfo> : I think i'm just going to recompile the entire kernel anyway; I was just fsrfo> : trying to not have to back-cvs /usr/src to patch the current one I have fsrfo> : installed. (the more basic problem is i really should be keeping multiple fsrfo> : versions of /usr/src around for different versions on different machines, fsrfo> : but that is a separate problem). fsrfo> modules/cam is what you want. Hmmm, looks like you have part of it in fsrfo> your kernel already, so you'll not be able to do what you want. fsrfo> Warner fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 9 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:56:45 +0200 fsrfo> From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 fsrfo> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> fsrfo> Cc: veldy@veldy.net fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050302165645.GB49216@ip.net.ua> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" fsrfo> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 09:13:22AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: >> In message: <421DE027.70204@veldy.net> >> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> writes: >> : Right away ... first thing! >> : >> : -------------------------------------------------------------- >> : >>> Installing everything >> : -------------------------------------------------------------- >> : cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install >> : ===> share/info >> : install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir >> : ===> include >> : creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh >> : touch: not found >> >> You have one of the canonical problems: >> >> (1) Time skew between building machine and installing machine >> (2) The path to the sources isn't exactly identical, in its canonical >> form, between building machine and installing machine >> (3) MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is different between building and installing. >> fsrfo> Besides, for NFS installs (by mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj and doing fsrfo> install) to work at all, the following conditions all must be met: fsrfo> 1) Architecture on both machines should be the same, fsrfo> 2) CPUs on both machines should be compatible [*], fsrfo> 3) FreeBSD versions should be IDENTICAL, fsrfo> 4) The contents of /etc/make.conf should be compatible. fsrfo> [*] Or the world on the build machine should be built with CFLAGS fsrfo> compatible with the CPU on the install machine. fsrfo> Cheers, fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Ruslan Ermilov fsrfo> ru@FreeBSD.org fsrfo> FreeBSD committer fsrfo> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo> Name: not available fsrfo> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo> Desc: not available fsrfo> Url : fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050302/434f456b/attachment-0001.bin fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 10 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:15:18 +0000 fsrfo> From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo> To: Thomas Krause <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <4225F4A6.8010200@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 fsrfo> Thomas Krause wrote: >> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >> [...] >> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. fsrfo> 1. You have some host names in ntp.conf which need to be resolved, and fsrfo> 2. At the time ntpd starts, the resolver isn't running. fsrfo> For some reason, ntpd makes one attempt to look up names in DNS and then fsrfo> goes into an infinite loop. fsrfo> Colin Percival fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 11 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:20:42 -0800 fsrfo> From: Freddie Cash <fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> fsrfo> Subject: Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503020920.43155.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo> On March 2, 2005 02:46 am, Rob wrote: >> In /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is the list of supported >> sound devices. I get confused by the pressence and >> absence of quotes here. Are these quotes only >> decoration, or really needed. For example: >> device "snd_ad1816" >> device snd_cmi >> If they are needed, it confuses me why one sound >> device needs quotes, and another doesn't? fsrfo> You have to put quotes around any device names with numbers in them. If fsrfo> you don't, the kernel config will error out. >> How does that affect the use of loading them in >> /boot/loader.conf? How about following two: fsrfo> It doesn't affect loader.conf. You only put quotes around the value of fsrfo> the variable ("YES" or "NO") not around the variable names. >> snd_ad1816_load="YES" >> snd_cmi_load="YES" >> Is that OK? fsrfo> Yes. fsrfo> However, if you add the devices to the kernel config file, you don't fsrfo> need to add them to loader.conf. loader.conf is used to load kernel fsrfo> modules. You need to decide whether to compile all devices into the fsrfo> kernel, or load some as kernel modules. fsrfo> Personally, I like to put devices that won't change (like USB, ATA, SMB, fsrfo> etc) into the kernel config file. And load devices that will change fsrfo> (like NICs, soundcards, etc) as modules via loader.conf. Saves time fsrfo> and effort when I decide to swap out NICs and test soundcards and fsrfo> similar. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Freddie Cash, CCNT CCLP Helpdesk / Network Support Tech. fsrfo> School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] fsrfo> fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 12 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:55:23 +0100 fsrfo> From: Mateusz J?drasik<imachine@toya.net.pl> fsrfo> Subject: ueagle(4) driver merging fsrfo> To: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <4225FE0B.1000604@toya.net.pl> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed fsrfo> Hi, fsrfo> I wonder how is the FreeBSD team looking on the driver ueagle written by fsrfo> one Damien Bergamini. It is a ADSL modem driver which connects using fsrfo> USB, a quite popular solution in Poland, and France as well, aparently. fsrfo> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem fsrfo> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? fsrfo> I would really like to see such a driver supported inside of the FreeBSD fsrfo> system itself since it would make me feel much more comfortable using a fsrfo> somewhat FreeBSD oficially supported code than third party patching. fsrfo> Here follows some more information regarding the project: fsrfo> http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ueagle/index.html fsrfo> Cheers, fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Mateusz Jкdrasik <imachine@toya.net.pl> fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 13 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:51:36 +1100 fsrfo> From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> fsrfo> Subject: Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes fsrfo> To: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> fsrfo> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050302185136.GA2302@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo> On Wed, 2005-Mar-02 02:46:41 -0800, Rob wrote: >>In /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is the list of supported >>sound devices. I get confused by the pressence and >>absence of quotes here. Are these quotes only >>decoration, or really needed. For example: >> >>device "snd_ad1816" >>device snd_cmi >> >>If they are needed, it confuses me why one sound >>device needs quotes, and another doesn't? fsrfo> For hysterical raisins, config(8) parses bareword arguments to "device" as fsrfo> <perl> fsrfo> ($device_name, $device_instance) = /([a-zA-Z_]+)([0-9]*)/; fsrfo> </perl> fsrfo> The double quotes force the first entry to be treated as a device fsrfo> "snd_ad1816", rather than the 1817th instance of "snd_ad". >>How does that affect the use of loading them in >>/boot/loader.conf? How about following two: >> >>snd_ad1816_load="YES" >>snd_cmi_load="YES" >> >>Is that OK? fsrfo> Yes. The loader has a different parsing algorithm: fsrfo> ${device_name}_load="{YES,NO}" fsrfo> and fsrfo> hint.$device_name.$device_instance.flag="VALUE" fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Peter Jeremy fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 14 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:06:27 -0800 (PST) fsrfo> From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net> fsrfo> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo> To: Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050302150553.N84651@paz.hyperreal.org> fsrfo> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed fsrfo> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:23:42AM +0200, Ege Mukan wrote: >> >>> Nowavadays whenever I want to surf on websites which contains flash >>> things my firefox or mozilla shuts itself. >>> >>> Did you ever encounter this problem. And if you'd how did you eliminate ??? >> >> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >> >> (as in >> >> Section "Extensions" >> Option "Composite" "Enable" >> EndSection >> >> ) >> >> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh >> >> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 fsrfo> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and fsrfo> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. fsrfo> Brian fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 15 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:07:55 -0800 fsrfo> From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> fsrfo> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo> To: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050302230755.7A0F05D07@ptavv.es.net> >> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET) >> From: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable@chef-ingenieur.de> >> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >> >> Hello, >> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >> >> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd >> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >> >> gate:/ # ntpq >> ntpq> peers >> No association ID's returned >> >> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine: >> >> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart >> Stopping ntpd. >> Starting ntpd. >> >> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp >> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd >> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift >> >> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. fsrfo> Either you have two commands to start ntpd in /etc/rc.d or (more likely) fsrfo> the parent process is never exiting. When ntpd starts, it forks a child fsrfo> process (the daemon) and exits. I have seen cases where the parent fsrfo> process never exits because the child never properly starts. fsrfo> That said, I have never seen this happen on a FreeBSD system, so it may fsrfo> be that you are starting it twice. But this seems a bit unlikely as the fsrfo> second daemon should exit immediately because the network socket is fsrfo> already in use. But it's possible that they are stating so close fsrfo> together that a race condition is locking things up. (Just speculation.) fsrfo> -- fsrfo> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer fsrfo> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) fsrfo> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) fsrfo> E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 16 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:11:23 -0800 fsrfo> From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> fsrfo> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) fsrfo> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050302231123.D14555D07@ptavv.es.net> >> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:15:18 +0000 >> From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> >> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >> >> Thomas Krause wrote: >> > when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running: >> > [...] >> > Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001. >> >> 1. You have some host names in ntp.conf which need to be resolved, and >> 2. At the time ntpd starts, the resolver isn't running. >> >> For some reason, ntpd makes one attempt to look up names in DNS and then >> goes into an infinite loop. fsrfo> Good idea. Yes, the DNS resolution in ntpd is really, really stupid. I fsrfo> always specify addresses in ntp.conf for this reason and the fact that fsrfo> it there are multiple addresses only the first returned will be fsrfo> tried. It never fails over if that one is dead. (And, should an IPv6 fsrfo> address be available on a system that does not have IPv6 fsrfo> connectivity...). fsrfo> -- fsrfo> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer fsrfo> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) fsrfo> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) fsrfo> E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 17 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:56:36 -0500 (EST) fsrfo> From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: fsrfo> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503021855350.28715-100000@sea.ntplx.net> fsrfo> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >> > >> > Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >> > >> > (as in >> > >> > Section "Extensions" >> > Option "Composite" "Enable" >> > EndSection >> > >> > ) >> > >> > Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh >> > >> > export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 >> >> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and >> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. fsrfo> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace fsrfo> out of it? fsrfo> -- fsrfo> DE fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 18 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:43:43 +1030 fsrfo> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Subject: Re: ueagle(4) driver merging fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503031043.52675.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" fsrfo> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:25, Mateusz Jкdrasik wrote: >> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem >> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? fsrfo> umodem is for serial modems not ADSL. I believe ADSL modems tend to send fsrfo> either ATM or ethernet frames whereas umodem deals with RS232 like devices. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo> Name: not available fsrfo> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo> Desc: not available fsrfo> Url : fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/abd25763/attachment-0002.bin fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 19 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:43:43 +1030 fsrfo> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Subject: Re: ueagle(4) driver merging fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503031043.52675.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" fsrfo> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:25, Mateusz Jкdrasik wrote: >> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem >> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver? fsrfo> umodem is for serial modems not ADSL. I believe ADSL modems tend to send fsrfo> either ATM or ethernet frames whereas umodem deals with RS232 like devices. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo> Name: not available fsrfo> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo> Desc: not available fsrfo> Url : fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/abd25763/attachment-0003.bin fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 20 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:16:22 -0800 (PST) fsrfo> From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> fsrfo> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050302161410.X84651@paz.hyperreal.org> fsrfo> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed fsrfo> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>>> >>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>>> >>>> (as in >>>> >>>> Section "Extensions" >>>> Option "Composite" "Enable" >>>> EndSection >>>> >>>> ) >>>> >>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh >>>> >>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 >>> >>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and >>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. >> >> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace >> out of it? fsrfo> Because, as I said earlier this thread: fsrfo> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it fsrfo> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I fsrfo> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I fsrfo> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone fsrfo> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla fsrfo> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something. fsrfo> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a fsrfo> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response to fsrfo> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom fsrfo> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? fsrfo> Brian fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 21 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:31:36 -0500 (EST) fsrfo> From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: fsrfo> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503021926300.28715-100000@sea.ntplx.net> fsrfo> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> > >> > Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace >> > out of it? >> >> Because, as I said earlier this thread: >> >> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it >> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I >> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I >> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone >> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla >> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something. >> >> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a >> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response to >> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom >> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? fsrfo> Is it that hard to type 'firefox -g', alias firefox="firefox -g", or fsrfo> whatever, and use it that way for a few days to see if you can fsrfo> get a trace? I'm just wondering if it has the same problem fsrfo> as linuxpluginwrapper, or bad assumptions about mutexes fsrfo> being recursive or unlocking one you don't own. fsrfo> Most folks I know use the linuxpluginwrapper so we don't have fsrfo> any experience with the native flash player. I think I recall fsrfo> trying it and it not working, hence the use of linuxpluginwrapper. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> DE fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 22 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:54:23 +0000 fsrfo> From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo> To: brian@hyperreal.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <E1D6ebf-000Dcm-Ut@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> >> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom >> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? fsrfo> No, it doesnt work for me either - but I dont care enough about fsrfo> websites with mflash to bother looking into it. fsrfo> -pcf. fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 23 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:22:58 -0600 fsrfo> From: Eric Schuele <e.schuele@computer.org> fsrfo> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. fsrfo> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <42269122.7000505@computer.org> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo> Brian Behlendorf wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ? >>>>> >>>>> (as in >>>>> >>>>> Section "Extensions" >>>>> Option "Composite" "Enable" >>>>> EndSection >>>>> >>>>> ) >>>>> >>>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! >>>>> /bin/sh >>>>> >>>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 >>>> >>>> >>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and >>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12. >>> >>> >>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace >>> out of it? >> >> >> Because, as I said earlier this thread: >> >> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it >> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I >> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I >> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone >> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla >> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something. >> >> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a >> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response >> to Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom >> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work? >> fsrfo> Fails for me too. On all flash sites near as I can tell. fsrfo> -Eric >> Brian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Regards, fsrfo> Eric fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 24 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:40:28 -0700 fsrfo> From: Didier Caamano <nemesisdivina@gennux.ca> fsrfo> Subject: Dual booting with Windows XP fsrfo> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Message-ID: <4226953C.7080107@gennux.ca> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo> Hello everyone: fsrfo> This might sound rather foolish, but I need some assistance on how to fsrfo> dual boot FBSD 5.3 with WinXP. fsrfo> I have to Hard Drives, Windows is in the first drive, and I want to fsrfo> install FBSD on the second. No in the installation process I choose to fsrfo> create the partitions to the second Hard Drive, then it ask me if I want fsrfo> to install the boot manager, to which I answer yes, then it ask me where fsrfo> to install it, and I choose to the First Hard drive, is that ok? well, fsrfo> what happens is that after I choose the installer send me to disklabel fsrfo> to slice the Hard drive, but it show the First hard drive. fsrfo> am I making any sense at all? I thought that installing the boot manager fsrfo> was going to be a straigh forward process, is there anything wrong with fsrfo> what I am experiencing? Any help will be appreciated. fsrfo> Good night everyone fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 25 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:48:19 -0500 fsrfo> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com> fsrfo> Subject: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022048b90c457@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in make.conf fsrfo> CPUTYPE=i686 fsrfo> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe fsrfo> It was built on a p4. fsrfo> I went to install this on my trusty firewall machine and I get the following fsrfo> error: fsrfo> -----BEGIN ERROR----- fsrfo> CD Loader 1.2 fsrfo> Building the boot loader arguments fsrfo> Looking up /BOOT/LOADER... Found fsrfo> Relocating the loader and the BTX fsrfo> Starting the BTX loader fsrfo> BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 fsrfo> int=0000000d err=000000c0 efl=00010a47 eip=00015528 fsrfo> eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=ffffffff edx=00094fa0 fsrfo> esi=01164e7f edi=c8b66ff7 ebp=00093ff8 esp=7c24ddf4 fsrfo> cs=002b ds=0033 es=0033 fs=0033 gs=0033 ss=0033 fsrfo> cs:eip=9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 fsrfo> 9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 fsrfo> ss:esp=ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff fsrfo> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff fsrfo> BTX halted fsrfo> -----END ERROR----- fsrfo> Also, the 5.3.isos downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org fail to boot as well. fsrfo> It's not hardware related as I'm able to pop in a OpenBSD3.6 snapshot fsrfo> and boot from that. fsrfo> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm going to try the floppies next. fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 26 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:56:57 -0800 fsrfo> From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Crash when PREEMPTION enabled fsrfo> To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050303045657.GA6139@xor.obsecurity.org> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" fsrfo> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:13:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: >> I have tried enabling PREEMPTION on 5.3-RELEASE-p5 whilst it ran OK >> for a few hours, it crashed overnight whilst doing a "make index" in >> /usr/ports. I've tried repeating "make index" and it worked. I have >> a coredump of the crash and have been doing some poking around. fsrfo> I've just turned on PREEMPTION on the 12-CPU sparc64 machine running fsrfo> RELENG_5 that I've been playing with, and it quickly resets and fsrfo> reboots under load (buildworld -j12). This happens with either ULE or fsrfo> 4BSD, although ULE without PREEMPTION seems to work fine (and perform fsrfo> much better than 4BSD, as expected). fsrfo> It looks like PREEMPTION is indeed still broken in RELENG_5 - I guess fsrfo> my workloads aren't enough to trigger this on other machines :-( fsrfo> Kris fsrfo> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo> Name: not available fsrfo> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo> Desc: not available fsrfo> Url : fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050302/d783fa82/attachment-0001.bin fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 27 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:00:22 -0800 fsrfo> From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503022100.28784.reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 fsrfo> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 08:48 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: >> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in >> make.conf >> >> CPUTYPE=i686 >> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe >> >> It was built on a p4. fsrfo> CFLAGS should be -O2 not -02 and you really may want to concider just -O fsrfo> -Mike fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 28 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:09:11 -0500 fsrfo> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022109d8561e2@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> I didn't cut and paste that. I had to copy everything by hand. It's fsrfo> correct in the make.conf. fsrfo> Best, fsrfo> Edwin fsrfo> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:00:22 -0800, Michael C. Shultz fsrfo> <reso3w83@verizon.net> wrote: >> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 08:48 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: >> > I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in >> > make.conf >> > >> > CPUTYPE=i686 >> > CFLAGS=-02 -pipe >> > >> > It was built on a p4. >> >> CFLAGS should be -O2 not -02 and you really may want to concider just -O >> >> -Mike >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 29 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:15:28 -0500 fsrfo> From: Nicholas Basila <mlists@northglobe.com> fsrfo> Subject: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo> To: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <42269D70.5090806@northglobe.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm fsrfo> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on fsrfo> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried fsrfo> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my fsrfo> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this fsrfo> failure is after the make depend... during the make): fsrfo> linking kernel fsrfo> if_ndis_pccard.o(.text+0xc): In function `ndis_probe_pccard': fsrfo> : undefined reference to `drv_data' fsrfo> if_ndis_pci.o(.text+0x14): In function `ndis_probe_pci': fsrfo> : undefined reference to `drv_data' fsrfo> *** Error code 1 fsrfo> Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HP09. fsrfo> This card worked fine with 5.3-RELEASE. It's a Broadcom 54G wireless NIC fsrfo> on an HP zd7140us notebook. Any thoughts? fsrfo> Regards, fsrfo> Nicholas fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 30 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:15:03 -0500 fsrfo> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022115363d3fde@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> It boots OK from the floppies as a work around... fsrfo> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:48:19 -0500, Edwin Brown fsrfo> <edwin.brown@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in make.conf >> >> CPUTYPE=i686 >> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe >> >> It was built on a p4. >> >> I went to install this on my trusty firewall machine and I get the following >> error: >> -----BEGIN ERROR----- >> CD Loader 1.2 >> >> Building the boot loader arguments >> Looking up /BOOT/LOADER... Found >> Relocating the loader and the BTX >> Starting the BTX loader >> >> BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 >> >> int=0000000d err=000000c0 efl=00010a47 eip=00015528 >> eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=ffffffff edx=00094fa0 >> esi=01164e7f edi=c8b66ff7 ebp=00093ff8 esp=7c24ddf4 >> cs=002b ds=0033 es=0033 fs=0033 gs=0033 ss=0033 >> cs:eip=9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 >> 9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00 >> ss:esp=ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >> BTX halted >> -----END ERROR----- >> Also, the 5.3.isos downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org fail to boot as well. >> >> It's not hardware related as I'm able to pop in a OpenBSD3.6 snapshot >> and boot from that. >> >> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm going to try the floppies next. >> fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 31 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:25:30 -0800 fsrfo> From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) fsrfo> To: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503022125.31189.reso3w83@verizon.net> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 fsrfo> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 09:09 pm, Edwin Brown wrote: >> I didn't cut and paste that. I had to copy everything by hand. It's >> correct in the make.conf. >> >> Best, >> >> Edwin >> fsrfo> OK, did you try just using -O? There is a note about that in the fsrfo> make.conf file. fsrfo> -Mike fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 32 fsrfo> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:50:41 -0800 fsrfo> From: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for fsrfo> FreebBSD 4.10 fsrfo> To: Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> fsrfo> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> fsrfo> Message-ID: <57d7100005030221505d8ff1b2@mail.gmail.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII fsrfo> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> wrote: >> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2) >> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ? >> >> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE >> driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure). fsrfo> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have fsrfo> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well, fsrfo> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If fsrfo> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in fsrfo> software via VINUM? fsrfo> -p fsrfo> -- fsrfo> ~~o0OO0o~~ fsrfo> Pete Wright fsrfo> www.nycbug.org fsrfo> NYC's *BSD User Group fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 33 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:42:33 +1030 fsrfo> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503031642.39981.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote: >> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >> failure is after the make depend... during the make): fsrfo> How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from? fsrfo> etc.. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo> Name: not available fsrfo> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo> Desc: not available fsrfo> Url : fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/b6b2f887/attachment-0002.bin fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 34 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:42:33 +1030 fsrfo> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503031642.39981.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote: >> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >> failure is after the make depend... during the make): fsrfo> How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from? fsrfo> etc.. fsrfo> -- fsrfo> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fsrfo> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au fsrfo> "The nice thing about standards is that there fsrfo> are so many of them to choose from." fsrfo> -- Andrew Tanenbaum fsrfo> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C fsrfo> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo> Name: not available fsrfo> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo> Desc: not available fsrfo> Url : fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/b6b2f887/attachment-0003.bin fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 35 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:20:58 -0500 fsrfo> From: Nicholas Basila <mlists@northglobe.com> fsrfo> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <4226ACCA.1020503@northglobe.com> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed fsrfo> Daniel O'Connor wrote: >>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote: >> >> >>>I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >>>using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >>>5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >>>rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >>>original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >>>failure is after the make depend... during the make): >>> >>> >> >>How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from? >>etc.. >> >> >> fsrfo> Well, I've been using the official HP driver. I ran the utility like so: fsrfo> ndiscvt -i name_of_nt_driver.inf -s name_of_nt_driver.sys -o fsrfo> /tmp/ndis_driver_data.h fsrfo> I then copied it to the compile directory of my kernel. Make depend runs fsrfo> correctly, but it crashes out during the linking phase of make. I have fsrfo> these options at the bottom of my kernel config: fsrfo> options NDISAPI fsrfo> device ndis fsrfo> device wlan fsrfo> As I said, this worked perfectly with 5.3 and even 5-current before the fsrfo> 5.3 release. I tried building the stable version of ndiscvt, and that fsrfo> didn't produce a different header file. I did a cvsup two days ago, got fsrfo> the error, and did a new cvsup tonight. fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 36 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:30:44 +0100 (CET) fsrfo> From: pcasidy@casidy.com fsrfo> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo> To: mlists@northglobe.com fsrfo> Cc: stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <20050303062137.3DFFFB86C@smtp.casidy.net> fsrfo> Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii fsrfo> On 3 Mar, Nicholas Basila wrote: >> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm >> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on >> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried >> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my >> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this >> failure is after the make depend... during the make): >> >> linking kernel >> if_ndis_pccard.o(.text+0xc): In function `ndis_probe_pccard': >> : undefined reference to `drv_data' >> if_ndis_pci.o(.text+0x14): In function `ndis_probe_pci': >> : undefined reference to `drv_data' >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HP09. >> >> >> This card worked fine with 5.3-RELEASE. It's a Broadcom 54G wireless NIC >> on an HP zd7140us notebook. Any thoughts? fsrfo> I had exactly this problem when my ndis_driver_data.h was built with a fsrfo> previous version of ndiscvt. You may have to update your world too. fsrfo> Hope that helps! fsrfo> Phil. fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 37 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:32:36 +0100 fsrfo> From: Emanuel Strobl <emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> fsrfo> Subject: -PRErelease and ACPI: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503030732.41525@harrymail> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" fsrfo> Dear Hackers, fsrfo> on one remote machine I see the following error (RELENG_5 from this night): fsrfo> pcib0: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA fsrfo> I have only ssh access and putting "-v" in /boot.config didn't help me getting fsrfo> a verbose dmesg. fsrfo> Anyway, I think it's caused by a bogus BIOS but I wanted to make sure having fsrfo> it reported. fsrfo> Last version was RELENG_5 from Nov. 5th and I also had a ACPI error but more fsrfo> detailed. Unfortunately I lost the output.... fsrfo> Thanks, fsrfo> -Harry fsrfo> -------------- next part -------------- fsrfo> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... fsrfo> Name: not available fsrfo> Type: application/pgp-signature fsrfo> Size: 187 bytes fsrfo> Desc: not available fsrfo> Url : fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/4105ef46/attachment-0001.bin fsrfo> ------------------------------ fsrfo> Message: 38 fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:27:46 +1030 fsrfo> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source fsrfo> To: Nicholas Basila <mlists@northglobe.com> fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org fsrfo> Message-ID: <200503031727.52538.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" fsrfo> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:50, Nicholas Basila wrote: >> Well, I've been using the official HP driver. I ran the utility like so: fsrfo> I don't know where the official HP driver is (hint: a URL would be handy) >> ndiscvt -i name_of_nt_driver.inf -s name_of_nt_driver.sys -o >> /tmp/ndis_driver_data.h >> >> I then copied it to the compile directory of my kernel. Make depend runs >> correctly, but it crashes out during the linking phase of make. I have >> these options at the bottom of my kernel config: >> >> options NDISAPI >> device ndis >> device wlan fsrfo> I would suggest building it as a module as it's much simpler (unless you're fsrfo> booting over this interface - which is doubtful) fsrfo> eg.. fsrfo> cd /usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis fsrfo> cp /tmp/foo.inf /tmp/foo.sys . fsrfo> ndiscvt -i foo.inf -s foo.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h fsrfo> make fsrfo> make install >> As I said, this worked perfectly with 5.3 and even 5-current before the >> 5.3 release. I tried building the stable version of ndiscvt, and that >> didn't produce a different header file. I did a cvsup two days ago, got >> the error, and did a new cvsup tonight. fsrfo> Make sure your userland and kernel are in sync - ie install world to match fsrfo> your new kernel. You may be building against stale headers. В данном сообщении отсутствует тема письма. Информирую Вас, что подобные сообщения если и будут рассматриваться, то в последнюю очередь. Прошу Вас впредь, для ускорения обработки Ваших сообщений указывать их тему. -- С уважением, Пенерджи Р.В. Начальник отдела ИТ ЗАО Корпорация "СХолдинг" mailto:prv@s-holding.ru mailto:prv0@yandex.ru +7 095 933-8678 +7 095 933-2811
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1576425481.20050303111635>