Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:41:06 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) Message-ID: <20090201054106.GE95647@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <200902010432.n114WY3C080488@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> References: <20090113044111.134EC1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> <20090113222023.GA51810@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <496D1ED6.4090202@FreeBSD.org> <496DD37E.5010900@gmx.de> <58DAD35B6CCC476E89B9D02F51041E87@PegaPegII> <200902010432.n114WY3C080488@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:32:34PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > David O'Brien writes: > >Given there isn't a new C standard being worked on post C99 (only > >addendums) > > That's news to me, and apparently news to WG14 as well. (See WG14 > N1250.) Hum... I know there is a ISO C++ 200x standard. Just Friday I was briefly looking for information on any new C 200x standard being worked on. Sorry I missed it. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Standards.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_C also doesn't mention it. :-( I now found this searching for "C1x" http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1250.pdf thanks for the nudge to find it. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090201054106.GE95647>