Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:24:54 -0800 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: bsd@xtremedev.com, questions@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.0-DP2 ACLs on UFS2 Message-ID: <20021126142454.A76195@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021126171701.88614G-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from rwatson@freebsd.org on Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 05:18:13PM -0500 References: <20021125055024.H42486-100000@Amber.XtremeDev.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021126171701.88614G-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* De: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> [ Data: 2002-11-26 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: 5.0-DP2 ACLs on UFS2 ]
> ACLs should work fine on any UFS2 partition where ACLs are enabled. I'm
> wondering if it's actually UFS2, or if dumpfs is lying to you. Could you
libufs stores the UFS version in disk.d_ufs based on the magic in the sblock
it finds, and then dumpfs simply does something like....
printf("UFS%d", disk.d_ufs);
More or less... So if it's lying, there's something much more fundamentally
wrong :)
--
Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>
OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer.
ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict.
FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021126142454.A76195>