Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:18:34 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Shawn Webb <lattera@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] ASLR, PIE, and segvguard on 11-current and 10-stable Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokSSZyyYZQuRHZJ9O2b_zPJtucqhRwA3ssYQrHt=mYDjA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140514170959.GA31277@pwnie.vrt.sourcefire.com> References: <20140514135852.GC3063@pwnie.vrt.sourcefire.com> <CAJ-Vmonm5k05ap03CvXR3tosJ6at-gxeaT0d4%2BJ1QzQ8-5viww@mail.gmail.com> <20140514170959.GA31277@pwnie.vrt.sourcefire.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 May 2014 10:09, Shawn Webb <lattera@gmail.com> wrote: > It runs on all architectures FreeBSD supports. The question is how well > it runs. The wider the testing, the better the code, of course. We're > actively testing on amd64 and i386 with limited testing on sparc64 and > ARM. I've been running with this patches on amd64 on multiple machines > for months. amd64 is rock solid from my experience. But your mileage may > vary, hence the CFT. :-) :) So for MIPS, there's a documented way to run up the emulator framework to do testing. https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/MipsEmulation That way you can give it a whirl before us MIPS people with hardware can get around to it. :P -a
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokSSZyyYZQuRHZJ9O2b_zPJtucqhRwA3ssYQrHt=mYDjA>