Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 10:15:08 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: des@flood.ping.uio.no Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hiding symbols Message-ID: <199812171815.KAA01201@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpg1afi83q.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <199812170603.RAA25943@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In article <xzpg1afi83q.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>,
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> wrote:
> Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes:
> > Don't hide symbols. It breaks debugging. Just give them a name in
> > the implementation namespace.
>
> That is, throw in an underscore in front?
>
> (Hmm, where are those namespaces defined in the standard? The only
> reference I can find in the index is to section 6.1.2.3 which is about
> labels, structure tags, structure members and other identifiers having
> separate namespaces)
My copy is a pre-release draft, but it's section 4.1.2.1 there.
Look in the index under "reserved identifiers" and you'll probably
find it.
John
--
John Polstra jdp@polstra.com
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public."
-- H. L. Mencken
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812171815.KAA01201>