Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:32:18 -0800 From: Devin Teske <devin.teske@fisglobal.com> To: inquiz <inquiz@gmx.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: * Re: FreeBSD 9 Message-ID: <563922A4-0AAB-409A-8B94-B7E2116052A3@fisglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <loom.20120119T161816-667@post.gmane.org> References: <BLU160-W54C133B8003EF140C41EF7AE860@phx.gbl> <loom.20120119T094302-811@post.gmane.org> <CCBA4B39-9E87-45B1-A82F-CA8F6B202269@fisglobal.com> <loom.20120119T161816-667@post.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 19, 2012, at 7:20 AM, inquiz wrote: > Devin Teske <devin.teske <at> fisglobal.com> writes: >=20 >> ...=20 >>> The new installer got rid of dependencies and is scriptable - very good= ! >>=20 >> ??? >>=20 >> *cough* Old installer _is_ scriptable and had less external dependencies= as it >> was written in C not sh(1) *cough* >=20 > Well, here it is: >=20 > http://wiki.freebsd.org/BSDInstall >=20 Right, but those claims (1 - being scriptable and 2 - not requiring utiliti= es outside the base) are *both* not unique to bsdinstall and its predecesso= r (sysinstall) exhibited both those features long before bsdinstall. We've been scripting sysinstall since 2006. Successfully, I might add (and = yes, we plan to release a 9.0 scripted sysinstall image to "share the love"= ). --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?563922A4-0AAB-409A-8B94-B7E2116052A3>