Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:13:20 +1100 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
To:        Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org>
Cc:        src-committers@FreeBSD.org, d@delphij.net, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org>, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r198848 - head/bin/ps
Message-ID:  <20091113010924.M1122@besplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091112050515.GA15002@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
References:  <200911030928.nA39SjLx085597@svn.freebsd.org> <20091103214231.H23957@delplex.bde.org> <4AF4B6B2.3090706@delphij.net> <20091111230915.B3510@besplex.bde.org> <20091112050515.GA15002@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Peter Jeremy wrote:

> On 2009-Nov-11 23:22:36 +1100, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Xin LI wrote:
>>> Will it sound reasonable to divide pcpu by ncpu and cap the number at 100?
>>
>> I don't like that.  It would break scripts even more than units changes.
>> It is hard for users to interpret too.  Suddenly, processes taking
>> 100% of 1 CPU would take 12.5% of 8 CPUs on a system with 8 CPUs, and
>> different %CPU on systems with a different number of CPUs.
>
> Solaris does this.  I found it particularly annoying for identifying
> spinning, single-threaded processes - it's not as immediately obvious
> that 1.6% CPU means a spinning process on a T5000, and the granularity
> gets worse.

We might eventually need an option for bug for bug compatibility with
Solaris(Olaris?)/POSIX.  A %cpu format could give the divided %CPU for
anyone that wants it sooner.

>> Just print %CPU in %4.0f format when it is >= 99.5 (or whatever rounds
>> to 100.0).  This works up to 999.5 %CPU.
>
> Actually, %4.0f works up to 9999.5 %CPU because there's no '.' in the
> result.  I think this is an excellent solution.  And since FreeBSD
> currently has a hard limit of 64 CPUs, it's unlikely to be exceeded
> for a while.

Oops.

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091113010924.M1122>