Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:52:50 +0200
From:      Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Journaling UFS with gjournal.
Message-ID:  <20060622095250.GD30568@garage.freebsd.pl>
In-Reply-To: <1150833586.24301.1.camel@spirit>
References:  <20060619131101.GD1130@garage.freebsd.pl> <44984A91.8040805@rogers.com> <20060620193630.GA8007@garage.freebsd.pl> <1150833586.24301.1.camel@spirit>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:59:46AM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
+> ??? 2006-06-20?????? 21:36 +0200???Pawel Jakub Dawidek?????????
+> > The performance impact is big for large files, because in theory we ha=
ve
+> > to write the data twice.
+> > Yes, it eliminates need for SU, but there are reasons, that you still
+> > want to use SU, eg. for snapshots.
+>=20
+> Em...  IIRC SU and snapshots are independent, no?

Oops. Yes, you are right. bgfsck depends on SU, not snapshots.

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

--jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEmmhyForvXbEpPzQRAohQAJ9cSI5QpRK5ghxwucJ91+fshMSIigCfeDjD
UHVHqWF9yKOf+SsGJViLP5c=
=nTBz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060622095250.GD30568>