Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 06:52:56 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> To: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com> Cc: Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NTP packet routing problem Message-ID: <20020118065256.U72285@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <13699.1011247617@brown.pfcs.com>; from Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com on Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:06:57AM -0500 References: <"20020117164811.T72285"@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> <13699.1011247617@brown.pfcs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-Jan-17 01:06:57 -0500, Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com> wrote: >It might also be the NTP associations - ntpd makes it associations based on >the IP of the local machine, and if your PPP link goes down/up and you get a >new IP then ntpd will continue to attempt to communicate using its old >IP address (association). I'm using static IP addresses so that's not it. >OBTW, if you are using PPP connections for NTP it's probably a good idea to >use both the "burst" and "tinker huffpuff 7200" (more or less) things in >your ntp.conf file. Thanks for that. I've enabled "burst", but I missed the "huffpuff". Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020118065256.U72285>