Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 May 2010 13:04:08 -0700
From:      Weongyo Jeong <weongyo.jeong@gmail.com>
To:        Gustavo Perez Querol <gperez@entel.upc.edu>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver
Message-ID:  <20100508200408.GC31100@weongyo>
In-Reply-To: <58220.88.15.97.205.1273248485.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
References:  <20100228095259.GB3536@weongyo> <20100301103240.3a4aac8a.ray@dlink.ua> <20100303082833.GB22865@weongyo> <20100303111014.6564ea1e.ray@dlink.ua> <20100312231333.GZ1295@weongyo> <4BD2201E.3090409@entel.upc.edu> <20100424231755.GI65380@weongyo> <4BD4A928.8020901@entel.upc.edu> <20100506190653.GA31100@weongyo> <58220.88.15.97.205.1273248485.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to
> > read and work email and wireless stuffs.
> >
> > Could you please test this symptom with attached patch?  It looks in
> > CURRENT it missed to initialize a ratectl when it associates with AP.
> >
> 
>   The patch made the machine to panic. I think it happened when launching
> the supplicant. In fact, right now it works by putting the RF switch to
> OFF. As soon as I change it to ON the machine panics.
> 
>   It get a trap 12, with two reasons : page fault and "bufwrite, buffer is
> not busy?"
> 
>   I'm running 9.0/AMD64 from 1 of May (don't know exact svn revision).
> 
>   Do you want me to test anything else ?

Please give me some time to prepare another patch.  My machine
encountered another problem which looks related with serial console so I
can not test my patch due to kernel panic.

regards,
Weongyo Jeong




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100508200408.GC31100>