Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:58:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fstack protector Message-ID: <20030411115522.I6045@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20030411111302.G4749@cvs.imp.ch>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Martin Blapp wrote: > Can't we add this to the gcc in the base_system for CURRENT ? > > It seems that OpenBSD 3.3 will contain this too as they > mention. > > Martin > > Martin Blapp, <mb@imp.ch> <mbr@FreeBSD.org> That'd work, except that then be dependant on the patch continuing to work during every gcc upgrade. One possible solution would be to have a gcc-ssp port which would build a SSP version of the base system's compiler, and call it gcc-ssp or something. Then we could make certain ports depend on using it, perhaps. The _real_ solution is for the gcc guys to integrate it into gcc 3.3, but I'm not sure how that could be made to happen. Mike "Silby" Silbersackhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030411115522.I6045>