Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 20:28:27 -0700 From: "Brian O'Shea" <boshea@ricochet.net> To: Tom <tom@toetag.com> Cc: FreeBSD Alpha <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Softupdates on Alpha ?? Message-ID: <19990501202827.U2844@localdomain> In-Reply-To: <199905012214.PAA08611@toetag.com>; from Tom on Sat, May 01, 1999 at 03:14:56PM -0700 References: <000001be93f1$8eb52470$134b93cd@william> <199905012214.PAA08611@toetag.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 01, 1999 at 03:14:56PM -0700, Tom wrote: > > I've been running with soft-updates on: > /dev/da0a on / (local, soft-updates, writes: sync 5 async 14609) > mfs:29 on /tmp (asynchronous, local, writes: sync 14 async 546) > /dev/da0e on /usr (local, soft-updates, writes: sync 23 async 40410) > /dev/da0f on /var (local, soft-updates, writes: sync 254 async 27311) > > for months now, add to the question.... is there any reason why > I shouldn't be running with soft-updates enabled on / ? > Not to mention on /tmp (the way you have it set up). Do softupdates provide any performance benefit on MFS filesystems? -- Brian O'Shea boshea@ricochet.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990501202827.U2844>