Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:17:12 -0800 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amq -v Message-ID: <200101251517.f0PFHL614920@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 25 Jan 2001 01:20:52 %2B0100." <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101250119460.72776-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101250119460.72776-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.a c.at>, Gerald Pfeifer writes: > I haven't received any response to this. > > If I should file this somewhere else, please let me know. (Or am I > just wasting time, yours and mine, reporting issues like this??) > > Gerald > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > ...on my FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE systems prints > > > > % amq -v > > [...] > > Built by root@bento.FreeBSD.org on date Mon Nov 20 11:26:50 GMT 2000. > > cpu=i386 (little-endian), arch=i386, karch=i386. > > full_os=freebsd4.2-BETA, os=freebsd4, osver=4.2-BETA, vendor=unknown. > > ^^^^^ ^^^^^ > > > > which is not really correct. > > > > I believe this should be fixed for future releases. I noticed this too. After applying David O'Brien's pthread patch and building world again, e.g. I didn't cvsup a new source tree, it now says freebsd4.2-RELEASE. What I think is happening, w/o looking at the source, is that full_os and osver are obtained from the system that amd was built on, not the system it was built for. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101251517.f0PFHL614920>