Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 21:23:23 +0100 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Extremely poor interactive response under heave SCSI load Message-ID: <l03020903afbe216182fb@[194.32.164.2]> In-Reply-To: <199706061936.NAA00243@pluto.plutotech.com> References: Your message of "Fri, 06 Jun 1997 11:38:08 BST." <l03020900afbd97441c6f@[194.32.164.2]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 21:34 +0100 6/6/97, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >Even better hack. Just send an ordered transaction every once in a while >which will flush any "starved" simple-tagged transactions. This means that >you can always keep the queue full. Is that [slipping in an ordered transaction when there's a bunch of unordered transactions 'up the pipe'] actually going to work as desired for all the controllers of interest? -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03020903afbe216182fb>