Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:47:00 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 189109] [security] www/mod_spdy Apache module heartbleed bug Message-ID: <bug-189109-16115-JjubvFM5mu@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-189109-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-189109-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189109 --- Comment #6 from Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> --- Hm, (un)luckily it is at the moment the only implementation. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2014AprJun/0815.html I also thought about dynamically add apache22 to the mix via `make -V _DISTDIR -C ${PORTSDIR}/www/apache22` but that's a really dirty workaround. A small improvement would be already if the port picks the source from the apache22 DIST_SUBDIR. Some weeks ago there was a discussion on the upstream list to include spdy because of the ugly buildsystem and to keep it more compatible with current apache releases. http://marc.info/?t=139887674700005&r=1&w=2 Haven't done any tests/checkouts from this repo (enotime) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7653 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-189109-16115-JjubvFM5mu>