Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 18:37:57 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>, nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems after PAO -> 2.2.5 stable Message-ID: <199711030137.SAA04692@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199711030039.LAA00519@word.smith.net.au> References: <199711021122.MAA02609@gvr.gvr.org> <199711030039.LAA00519@word.smith.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Unfortunately, it looks like it only supports IRQ 3 as well. > > > > > > > It also does 4. > > Um, am I coming in at a bad place here? Are you talking about a PCCARD > that only supports IRQ 3? Yes, the card only supports interrupt 3 @ sio1. (And, FreeBSD doesn't yet have the smarts to fake it out.) > > So irq 3 is in use :-( > > ... and thus specifying it as the IRQ to use is a really bad idea. True, but it's not obvious that it's a bad idea unless you look at the boot messages. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711030137.SAA04692>