Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Apr 1996 08:01:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Robert N Watson <rnw+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To:        freebsd-questions@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD as DNS
Message-ID:  <0lQXee200YUf021UY0@andrew.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <31702B77.C2D@kconline.com>
References:  <31702B77.C2D@kconline.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Excerpts from internet.computing.freebsd-questions: 13-Apr-96 FreeBSD as
DNS Phil Lewis@kconline.com (376*)

> We're a new ISP looking to put in our own DNS. We have a T-1 being 
> installed the 1st of May. I've heard many good things about FreeBSD. I 
> was wondering if you would have more specific info on how FreeBSD works 
> with the new Netscape server software. Is this even necessary? The other 
> area we are considering is NT but not sure about its stability.

> Thanks for your input

I'm relatively sure that the new FastTrack server software does not
cover anything but NT (but don't quote me.)  I know the old server
software works great, because I'm currently testing Netscape
Communications Server as an alternative to NCSA httpd 1.5.1 (which I
installed a week or two ago, and discovered was extremely buggy), and it
appears to run very well (slightly faster, and certainly more robust.) 
When it comes to running a web server, especially  as an ISP trying to
support a wide audience of users, I would always select BSD over NT.  If
you need NT file sharing support for 95/etc users, you might want to
take a look at the Samba networking package (the install program gives
you the opportunity to set this up, and if not, it should be available
as a package in the networking subtree of the packages directory on
ftp.cdrom.com).  Using this setup, my users sabe their .html/etc
directly to their home directory using Netscape Gold, and it instantly
appears on their web page, no ftping, etc.  

A lot of people here suggest Apache, and I would agree that if money is
an object (and it often is :), Apache would be preferable because it is
free and offers much the same functionallity.  I don't know, however, if
it supports administration by means of the Netscape client, though.. 
The Netscape servers offer this very nice feature on all their servers,
I think.  But if you're running a BSD-style server, I'm sure you can
handle modifying a text config file instead :).  I use Apache on two
systems I admin, and have been very impressed by its performance and
quality.  I still plan to run Netscape Communications Server as it is
free for me since I am affiliated with an educational institution (CMU).

Robert Watson
rnw+@andrew.cmu.edu





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0lQXee200YUf021UY0>