Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:31:29 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@freebsd.org>, cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/unionfs union.h union_subr.c union_vfsops.c union_vnops.c src/sbin/mount_unionfs Makefile mount_unionfs.8 mount_unionfs.c Message-ID: <20061202152958.E20147@pooker.samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20061202210310.GB20693@crodrigues.org> References: <200612021935.kB2JZuLd023097@repoman.freebsd.org> <4571D7FC.3030408@samsco.org> <20061202210310.GB20693@crodrigues.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What you committed works without the associated VFS changes? If not, why rush this commit in? Scott On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:46:04PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: >> What about the VFS changes that were also made in the latest patchset? > > I'm looking at that change separately, and getting a few > other people to look at it too, before committing. > > -- > Craig Rodrigues > rodrigc@crodrigues.org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061202152958.E20147>