Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:51:05 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r334939 - head/stand/lua Message-ID: <20180612115105.GB75210@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrtK_Cn1N2RE=f5DS_UNLq6C493LUNwQoHvYX06noVZxg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201806110132.w5B1WI5d094546@repo.freebsd.org> <E6FA26B8-63CF-4927-AE20-644D985BACD8@freebsd.org> <CANCZdfrtK_Cn1N2RE=f5DS_UNLq6C493LUNwQoHvYX06noVZxg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:07:23AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > ... > The last articulated plan in arch@ was that LUA will be default in 12, and > we plan to remove FORTH in 13. Last time I said it there in February, there > was only email agreeing that I could find. This matches the in-person > consensus poll I took at BSDcan as well. I think it would take a very > extraordinary set circumstance and severe problems with LUA to change those > plans. For the idiots among us, what's wrong the with FICL-based loader(8) and why is it being replaced with Lua one? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180612115105.GB75210>