Date: 10 May 2002 16:48:17 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: APM Pain Message-ID: <1021015107.994.13.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200205091406.aa75790@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> References: <200205091406.aa75790@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 22:36, Ian Dowse wrote: > >current process = 85 (mount_nfs) > > I presume you've checked that all modules are in sync with the > kernel? The fault details say that it was doing a "mount_nfs"; does > the same problem occur if you compile NFS support statically into > the kernel? If so, try to get a new stack trace so that the NFS > related symbols are included. The modules are in sync. I think the mount_nfs think is a red herring as I spent a while compiling and cvs updateing and found that if I have a pre-MFC sound tree and everything else up to date I don't get a panic on suspend. Wohoo.. well I can live with pre-MFC sound anyway 8-) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1021015107.994.13.camel>