Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:40:25 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com> Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>, "Carlos A. Carnero Delgado" <carnero@icrt.cu>, Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Annoying ARP warning messages. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210281339290.24965-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C8533701022DBC@mail.sandvine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Don Bowman wrote: > From: Julian Elischer [mailto:julian@elischer.org] > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > > In this example, does the xl0 interface share the same MAC address? > > > > umm actually, yes.. sends switches insane.. :-) > > if you don't do the step about source Mac address replacement > > then they have different addresses. (though I can't guarantee that) > > Is there support for 802.3ad in FreeBSD? This would be the best > way to gang interfaces together in a standard fashion. It involves > LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol), which prevents loops > @ L2 (I think its an extension of STP). Packet reordering is also > solved (the simple round robin scheme achieves rather poor performance > due to this problem). > This could be (relatively) easy in netgraph.. it was designed for that sort of thing. > Another way to do it is with OSPF ECMP (Equal-Cost Multipath Routing), > depends on whether you think L2 is cool or L3 :) > > --don (don@sandvine.com www.sandvine.com) > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0210281339290.24965-100000>