Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 16:53:34 -0500 (CDT) From: Alex Nash <nash@mcs.net> To: Robin Melville <robmel@innotts.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Desperate search for rpc.rlockd Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960430165059.25984C-100000@Mercury.mcs.com> In-Reply-To: <v01530500adac3b3f36e5@[194.176.128.120]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
How about using Samba? The performance is better than NFS. See http://lake.canberra.edu.au/pub/samba/ Samba builds under FreeBSD right out of the box. Alex On Tue, 30 Apr 1996, Robin Melville wrote: > We've been planning to use NFS on freeBSD boxes to allow access to selected Windows PC's > > I've been trying to lay hands on a working implementation of the rlockd daemon. There is one amongst the ports collection but it's a dummy -- doesn't actually do any locking just always says "granted" to lock requests. > > Is anyone aware of a such a port? > > TIA > > Robin Melville. > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.91.960430165059.25984C-100000>