Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:04:18 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r305968 - head/etc/autofs Message-ID: <20160920100418.GI2960@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfpY%2Br3p2z6f59ZD7Vq2a60zMNpCncU3F0aaDu=kdHitgg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201609190851.u8J8pRDD068198@repo.freebsd.org> <op.yn1u4maukndu52@d93fd8ae.cm-21.dynamic.ziggo.nl> <20160920034337.GA6180@brick> <CANCZdfpY%2Br3p2z6f59ZD7Vq2a60zMNpCncU3F0aaDu=kdHitgg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:19:04PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > For MSDOS it's one thing and likely helps. But for ufs it doesn't > help. Soft updates already does an excellent job at reducing wear and > all async does is give added danger of dataloss. Linux distros don't > matter for UFS because different design decisions have been made for > ext[234] and UFS. SU mount of UFS and unexpected media loast can caused kernel panic at next mount this media. async mount don't have such issuse.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160920100418.GI2960>