Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:04:18 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r305968 - head/etc/autofs Message-ID: <20160920100418.GI2960@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfpY%2Br3p2z6f59ZD7Vq2a60zMNpCncU3F0aaDu=kdHitgg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201609190851.u8J8pRDD068198@repo.freebsd.org> <op.yn1u4maukndu52@d93fd8ae.cm-21.dynamic.ziggo.nl> <20160920034337.GA6180@brick> <CANCZdfpY%2Br3p2z6f59ZD7Vq2a60zMNpCncU3F0aaDu=kdHitgg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:19:04PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > For MSDOS it's one thing and likely helps. But for ufs it doesn't > help. Soft updates already does an excellent job at reducing wear and > all async does is give added danger of dataloss. Linux distros don't > matter for UFS because different design decisions have been made for > ext[234] and UFS. SU mount of UFS and unexpected media loast can caused kernel panic at next mount this media. async mount don't have such issuse.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160920100418.GI2960>