Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Oct 2000 18:06:21 -0600
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        Martin Minkus <diskiller@diskiller.net>, Gerald Heinig <Gerald.Heinig@post.rwth-aachen.de>, freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Anyone out there ?
Message-ID:  <39F7757D.9B13EDD4@softweyr.com>
References:  <054F7DAA9E54D311AD090008C74CE9BD01766CC4@exchange.panasonicfa.com> <029901c03e0d$6bb058b0$0200000a@lan.diskiller.net> <39F68D1C.45F9F336@softweyr.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters wrote:
> 
> Martin Minkus wrote:
> >
> > I subscribed to this list a few days ago, and after hearing nothing but
> > crickets (and the occasional NT server reboot far off in the distance) i
> > thought it was time to shake the stick, and see what response i can get ;)
> > Seems good so far :-)
> >
> > I have a Sun IPX, and Sun SparcServer 10 (both of which i picked up for free
> > recently).
> >
> > Okay.
> >
> > I believe the website (http://people.freebsd.org/~obrien/freebsd-sparc/)
> > shows there was a bias to simply develop for PCI based Ultra's (Sparc64
> > port?), which i definately have no access to. (Unless i can steal one from
> > my university ;-)
> >
> > It appears there are several people with the older 32bit Sparcs on this
> > list, but they don't have any coding experience. I do, but only in
> > userspace, though i've been slowly trying to make my move up into the kernel
> > :)
> >
> > It appears there would have to be two seperate ports, FreeBSD/sparc, and
> > FreeBSD/sparc64, but only differing in the kernel, the userspace would be
> > the same? This appears to be what Linux (I just read the UltraLinux website)
> > have done, and so has Net and OpenBSD.
> >
> > I have little experience with the sparc architecture, so i'm unaware of the
> > differences (between Sparc and Sparc64), but if the two are vastly
> > different, we'll have two maintain two seperate porting efforts... (OpenBSD
> > has done this, but the Sparc64 port has lagged and/or is dead)
> >
> > The linux kernel also seems to do some funky shit like binary patch itself
> > on boot ... :/
> 
> Shit is right.  Trust me, you can "binary patch" 32-bit SPARC instructions
> into 64-bit SPARC instructions.

Oh, great.  That                ^^^             was SUPPOSED to say "can't".

-- 
            "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                         Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com                                           http://softweyr.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39F7757D.9B13EDD4>