Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 23:48:45 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Jayachandran C." <jchandra@freebsd.org> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r225892 - head/sys/mips/mips Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokSNa%2BBSxeO=s%2BLrNE%2BnMD8_b4Yx51i_5E%2B8K2nkrxRsw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B7sy7Cin5-cHcP-8_qYGhpEnAN9gw6S5ekXYK6Q3X9FREQggA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2B7sy7BiRvTB79H9=y%2BS4jQ=%2BboW1bcDJn%2BBULMmJU9KLLVJ5A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokAsDpjJLt%2BVJ2gDGX%2BiMAwZvL2TPaaAD_LRm-Yyquxig@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B7sy7D6h5a08Q6yNfX6xSqwabDLzE5GLu5aV3fCMYQKn_4AoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmon32cVEVvC=3WJVmDkCUdyLWyec3sqU-ifzspVSPxedfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmomsq5PQzbCBmWob5juB9EqdcEoYV%2B9vwYjnJQYTo_%2B4kw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmon_a_zLZmEGqwFaYaobjYFE2i1u2Viq3QD5dw4wpNNURA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B7sy7DFCMxo-2bJwBJcSEJf7ewG7Y=XwdgKXkhpRyDXQpvsYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokPFqS2oNWZ_mFSxy=0MXfgqtOcBHSQe%2BdYXvsLHAyGjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomqmKPRHBCbt46_xXD0VoU47Q-vYWbAqCFaM635ZnOHWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomLbueaG3bmnT0WfeKaMSyXSNo80BWXqEe39z6x%2Bx8QoA@mail.gmail.com> <20111002110331.GF1511@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <CA%2B7sy7A%2Bq_N6Hr%2B3-tD=BJxmqtDgBeWF9HJCtopLF0RUz6hVyw@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B7sy7Ax9SXSK1CyxuBNboktJxuQTMiu3D4NFmZSoq7-ipoQgA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B7sy7Cin5-cHcP-8_qYGhpEnAN9gw6S5ekXYK6Q3X9FREQggA@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi all, I've tried jc's patch. The hand-wavy, brief summary when tested on my hostap (mips): * when doing single-stream, one way TCP tests (where it thus needs TX/RX traffic to occur), I get 100% CPU utilisation - 50% interrupt, 50% system, but the total interrupt rate isn't too high. It's much higher than without his patch. I'll go digging later to see what's going on. * when doing single-stream, one way UDP (ie, only RX traffic, no TX besides beacons and occasional other stuff), the system utilisation is better (70% system, ~ 2% interrupt). But I still see interrupt latency issues. I don't know whether it's because interrupts are missed or they're not missed but the scheduling doesn't occur until after wait has returned. I'll have to do some further digging. adrianhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokSNa%2BBSxeO=s%2BLrNE%2BnMD8_b4Yx51i_5E%2B8K2nkrxRsw>