Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:57:09 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <almarrie@gmail.com> To: attilio@freebsd.org Cc: youshi10@u.washington.edu, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 Message-ID: <499c70c0706050857i3f66cd14h19838c2e5229721f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46653084.7080502@FreeBSD.org> References: <499c70c0706041119o6c290fb3k7f234492df2f6548@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.43.0706041428260.27541@hymn02.u.washington.edu> <499c70c0706041441q4d4f13adtebd979ec87f71558@mail.gmail.com> <466488F0.9070802@FreeBSD.org> <499c70c0706041456x1a448348mec7410678c1f1d7d@mail.gmail.com> <46653084.7080502@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/5/07, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> wrote: > Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > Attilio, > > > > Thanks for explaining the issue deeper. > > > > So is fixing this issue would make FreeBSD runs apps faster than Linux > > or we will get the same result that linux offers now? > > This is not intended to improve the quickness of a program per-se (I'm > not saying it is impossible to happen, just that it would be a side > effect), but it is intended to improve scalabilty. > I expect a very good boost up on scalabilty for us by these jeff's > efforts, but quantify now is not very simple. Time will say better than me. > > Attilio I just did csup, and the CPU with 2 COREs usage looks better now, and things run really faster with SCHED_ULE Thank You Jeff, Kris, Attilio, and Jhb, beside the rest of the guys who made this possible :) -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499c70c0706050857i3f66cd14h19838c2e5229721f>