Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:50:38 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS Issues with branch.. Was: Re: HEADS UP: Be nice to -CURRENT ( "1 week Feature Slush" ) Message-ID: <20020314205038.A81751@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020314213422.4489F-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:36:30PM -0500 References: <xzpwuwesgrj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020314213422.4489F-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:36:30PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > It's worth noting, BTW, that originally the release engineering team > planned to use Perforce for this to avoid the branch issue entirely, > minimize impact on the main tree, etc, but decided not to due to the high > volume of complaints on the topic. You would get no complaints from me. I think this would be a very good use of Perforce. In the past the WC -CURRENT snapshots were not tagged or branched w/in CVS. I don't see that the requirement to do so has been demanded. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020314205038.A81751>