Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:26:20 +0100 From: Udo Schweigert <udo.schweigert@siemens.com> To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> Cc: Clive Lin <clive@tongi.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/mutt Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20020129102619.GA26118@alaska.cert.siemens.de> In-Reply-To: <864rl5cwh5.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> References: <200201281806.g0SI6U989949@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020128181626.GA91155@malloc.eb.kliev.net> <20020128220136.GE49984@squall.waterspout.com> <20020129094005.GA11322@malloc.eb.kliev.net> <864rl5cwh5.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 18:55:34 +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> At Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:40:05 +0800,
> Clive Lin wrote:
> >> What's wrong with letting PORTREVISION propagate if the port has
> >> a master in mutt-devel? Seems like if the mutt port changes, so
> >> should its slave.
>>
>> Yup, but if I want to make "slave port only" change, I have no quick
>> knob for it ...
>
> What about doing like this:
>
> master:
>
> PORTREVISION?= 0 # master port's revision
>
> slave:
>
> PORTREVISION= 1 # slave port's revision
>
> .include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile"
>
I think this will be the best solution.
I have a patch here which will simplify the mutt-devel master port by some
extent and I will include the PORTREVISION?= to this.
Clive: do you agree?
Best regards
--
Udo Schweigert, Siemens AG | Voice : +49 89 636 42170
CT IC 3, Siemens CERT | Fax : +49 89 636 41166
D-81730 Muenchen / Germany | email : udo.schweigert@siemens.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020129102619.GA26118>