Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:04:30 -0600 From: "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@iteration.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Subject: Re: same interface Route Cache Message-ID: <20010320000430.A45830@peorth.iteration.net> In-Reply-To: <3AB58012.2D7F6A05@elischer.org>; from julian@elischer.org on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:42:10PM -0800 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103172322030.18063-100000@cody.jharris.com> <3AB4E92C.7F668DD9@softweyr.com> <3AB58012.2D7F6A05@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:42:10PM -0800, Julian Elischer scribbled: | Wes Peters wrote: | > It struck me last night that if you want to load-balance between two ISPs, | > you could simply pick a bit in the address and use it to select one or the Buy a Layer >4 switch for your home DSL+cable modem? /me ducks | > other. If you pick your bit appropriately -- I'd go for something in the | > second byte -- you might luck out and get a nearly 50/50 spread. That would | > be no less hackish and a lot easier to maintain. | | exactly what I suggested before, but the return packets will all come back | on a single interface, unless you pass all teh packets that are going out Just a stupid question, what about secure sessions of services that check for IP source and destinations to be the same? -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | keichii@iteration.net | keichii@freebsd.org | | http://iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010320000430.A45830>