Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:03:55 -0600 From: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Channel interference scan and manual selection Message-ID: <46B1EFC5-1AA4-4E51-B199-D4CDACEEA0AC@netgate.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomMXfPxVJLkvUS4=VDe_oiCNgbXa7Aj=E9QkYHJ=gtUag@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAC6a1Dh_vwAMNucd%2BFBB-3CFKpmW3SCRwBrLZfCv%2BaL5=SoJ2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonK6zp0tDaeKZatDwu=pr6RKzFC=An5YnVMc3XK1oeNUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC6a1DiPrA%2BksO%2BLQu%2BcRgB0jYnz=BcFfMBCmFaiF316OieOxw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomMXfPxVJLkvUS4=VDe_oiCNgbXa7Aj=E9QkYHJ=gtUag@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > Now, ideally it'd actually check the channel for interference and > channel busy status, and use _that_ metric. Ideally, it would attempt to get co-channel with other APs on the same = channel. Especially in 2.4GHz (or any of the 5GHz bands). Because you would *much* rather share the air (via collision avoidance) = than raise the noise floor for someone (everyone) else. And, given that everyone has a DC receiver these days, there are NO = =93non-overlapping channels=94. jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46B1EFC5-1AA4-4E51-B199-D4CDACEEA0AC>