Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:55:09 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, jeff@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r187580 - head/tools/sched Message-ID: <9bbcef730901221255u5767d16bo230da23542a171d7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0901221846230.66510@fledge.watson.org> References: <200901220621.n0M6LU5v002745@svn.freebsd.org> <20090122.104114.1927899760.imp@bsdimp.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0901221846230.66510@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/1/22 Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>: > FWIW, the one case where I don't really do that is when I worked on some > code on my own and hence hold the copyright for it, then did some work under > a contract for a customer on it such that they own the copyright on > enhancements, and then I do some further work on my own. In that case, I'll > leave a discontinuity to reflect the fact that the copyright on changes made > in the gap were assigned elsewhere. Not clear this is the right thing to > do, but I'm fairly sure at least some of my customers are more comfortable > with that as it leaves no confusion in the source as to which bits they > sponsored/own. Of course this is purely cosmetic as "one year" is a terrible granularity for commits to a moving target :) (i.e. legally it's worthless information)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9bbcef730901221255u5767d16bo230da23542a171d7>