Date: Tue, 01 Oct 1996 02:34:14 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: bde@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Your UserConfig changes for unmasking PCI devices... Message-ID: <4208.844162454@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 Oct 1996 18:55:27 %2B0930." <199610010925.SAA10913@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think (MHOO) that things were better when PCI devices weren't listed. > I know I meant them to show up, but unless they get grouped seperately > (ie. in a seperate class) you're right; people will get confused. Even having the bus type displayed in the description string, perhaps in a different text attribute, would be enough. So you'd see: bt0 Buslogic SCSI controller [PCI] bt0 Buslogic SCSI controller [ISA/EISA/VLB] And *only* if the machine in question even had a PCI bus. I can't see any reason to show the PCI entries on my 486/EISA test machine. :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4208.844162454>