Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:58:24 +0100 From: Marcio Cicero <marcio29@live.com> To: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Optimal Apache22 configuration Message-ID: <BAY126-W5770288081B230BC24118CB3790@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <1195731553.82763.30.camel@localhost> References: <BAY126-W36863ECD0AAAD381D72B60B3780@phx.gbl> <1195731553.82763.30.camel@localhost>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi Tom, Thanks for your input. As far as I can remember there were experimental support for kqueue polling events on apache2 which I remember as nice performance improvement. But unfortunately I can't find any info regarding kqueue for apache22. Is this possible for apache22? TIA Regards, Marcio > Subject: Re: Optimal Apache22 configuration > From: tevans.uk@googlemail.com > To: marcio29@live.com > CC: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:39:12 +0000 > > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 19:49 +0100, Marcio Cicero wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Tomorrow i'll start configuring an apache22 server at work and I've been searching what's the best configuration for apache22 on apache. > > > > Is it possible to use kqueue() support for apache22? Also, the best threading library around for apache22 on freebsd is libthr? > > > > The best mpm for this kind of environment is still worker? > > > > Is there any updated documentation on this matter? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > > Marcio > > > > We use a pair of apache22 webservers in a round robin configuration at > work, doing proxying to app servers and serving static content for all > our websites, and they run very nicely indeed under the event MPM. This > is still marked as 'experimental' as apache, but the reason is that it > doesn't support accept filters or SSL yet (support is planned). If you > need SSL, I'd go for worker. If you need PHP, I'd go for prefork :) > > We wanted a pair for redundancy and failover support, and we were unsure > one server could handle the load, but load tends to hover at about 0.1 > on both boxes, and they tend to 'just work', which is nice :) > > We use libthr, which works perfectly (as you would expect, lots of > apache devs run and recommend FreeBSD). > > Cheers > > Tom > > _________________________________________________________________ Explore the seven wonders of the world http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBREhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY126-W5770288081B230BC24118CB3790>