Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Oct 2005 01:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Arne "Wörner" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com>
To:        Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl
Message-ID:  <20051012085509.42394.qmail@web30310.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051012082550.GH2482@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--- Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-Oct-12 00:12:35 -0700, Arne Wörner wrote:
> >Btw: Why should the string "OpenSSL" be contained in each and
> >every executable, that might use OpenSSL?
> 
> OpenSSL has a version string of the form "OpenSSL 0.9.7e 25 Oct
> 2004" embedded in it.
> 
As far as I understand static linking, only the symbols that r
used r linked into the executable... So: Why should that version
string be linked into the executable? Is it a necessary part of
the SSL protocol to say the version?

-Arne



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Music Unlimited 
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051012085509.42394.qmail>