Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:45:54 -0400 From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org> To: Max Okumoto <okumoto@ucsd.edu> Cc: freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.org Subject: do we keep the H subsystem prefix? (was: stuff for README file) Message-ID: <20020411224554.GK302@lenny.anarcat.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <hf3cy2cb1h.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu> References: <hf3cy2cb1h.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 12:03:54PM -0700, Max Okumoto wrote: > > Index: README > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/libh/cvs/libh/README,v > +Assuming your new libh subsystem is called dance. > +[It looks like all libh subsystems are suffixed with a 'h' is this true for > +all subsystems and will it stay this way?] (i.e., hui is libH User Interface) I think that, yes, it is good practice to keep the h prefix in from of library/subsystems names. I'll add a note regarding that to HACKERS. A. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjy2EiEACgkQttcWHAnWiGfkBQCfWly/ZqF2fPH6VHbtLAsIuKES e4UAn1SGSWoGSLxrruq/BuTdmTTbYHcZ =R5+q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020411224554.GK302>