Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:15:51 -0400 From: Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Attempt #3, adding a new command 'sfilter' Message-ID: <p06230953c1263ba3af13@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20060907204058.GA34690@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200608281545.k7SFjn6l063922@lurza.secnetix.de> <44FF71AD.7060508@FreeBSD.org> <44FF72B9.7000201@elischer.org> <200609071057.44515.jhb@freebsd.org> <p0623094ec12621daa3d9@[128.113.24.47]> <20060907204058.GA34690@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 4:40 PM -0400 9/7/06, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 04:12:56PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > It seems reasonable to me to add a strftime() (and maybe a few other
>> features) to our base-system awk. But look at what happens if we
>> install gawk:
>>
>> -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 115732 May 29 21:01 /usr/bin/awk*
>> -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1201108 Sep 7 15:39 /usr/local/bin/gawk*
>
>xor# ls -l `which gawk`
>-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 225232 Sep 7 16:40 /usr/local/bin/gawk
>xor# ls -l `which awk`
>-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 123260 May 16 13:58 /usr/bin/awk
Huh. I wonder why there's such a difference. All I did was
portinstall -N gawk
on my FreeBSD 5.x-ish machine (I did it there just because I had a
root-session already open on that machine). I've never installed
gawk before. Uname:
FreeBSD freefour.acs.rpi.edu 5.5-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE
#0: Wed May 24 00:36:47 EDT 2006
root@xxx.rpi.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Athlon3k-5x i386
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosehn@rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06230953c1263ba3af13>