Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 05:25:08 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Yuri Karaban <ura@sphinx.univ.kiev.ua> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gnu getopt in libc Message-ID: <20011223052508.A99762@citusc17.usc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20011223094407.GA31337@sphinx.univ.kiev.ua>; from ura@sphinx.univ.kiev.ua on Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 11:44:07AM %2B0200 References: <20011222132030.GA19596@sphinx.univ.kiev.ua> <20011222201930.B9DEF38CC@overcee.netplex.com.au> <20011222212453.A91247@citusc17.usc.edu> <20011223094407.GA31337@sphinx.univ.kiev.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 11:44:07AM +0200, Yuri Karaban wrote: > > > > so why dont replace libc/stdlib/getopt.c by gnu version ? > > > > > > 1) because it is nonstandard > > > 2) it is GPL contaminated which we cannot use in libc. > > > > NetBSD have a BSDL'ed getopt_long() in their libc. It's required for > > GNU tar longopt support in pax(1) - I have an almost complete port of > > both in my tree. > Does the NetBSD getopt support the optional arguments and options reorder ? I don't know off-hand..I'm not even sure what you mean :) Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8Jds0Wry0BWjoQKURAsFrAKCYe7ar4uldH2juRQM9dHJafj4WjwCg8yth ng74mwhrUjgWpKgsbAZtnHw= =JSPh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011223052508.A99762>