Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 11:13:23 +0900 From: Eitarou Kamo <e-kamo@trio.plala.or.jp> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5-stable wpa_supplicant (Re: ral/wpa_supplicant drops after successful WPA negotiation?) Message-ID: <4408F7C3.5040600@trio.plala.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <20060303172333.GB9482@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <43F9E6B4.3040309@derooij.org> <43F9F4AD.3070107@errno.com> <43FA61A4.8030406@derooij.org> <141fde50602280533m7460ada3i@mail.gmail.com> <440515B6.1080202@errno.com> <141fde50603020907q348d037bn@mail.gmail.com> <4407BD72.6030702@trio.plala.or.jp> <20060303161817.GA9482@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <44086EF7.2080700@trio.plala.or.jp> <20060303172333.GB9482@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:29:43AM +0900, Eitarou Kamo wrote: > > > > Because supporting WPA required incompatible changes to the > in-kernel driver API and we don't make those in release branches > without really good reason. Since 6.0 is much better than 5.x > anyway, there was no justification for the disruption the merge > would have caused. > > -- Brooks > I see..... Eitarou -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFECPfDuCrAEJBwrGwRAkI0AJ0ZQjGx7PhHsxy8zzTg4EQTYS+0YACdGNWB /uE/bjUKOcqAxdCB4jeCMaE= =GEdb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4408F7C3.5040600>