Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:30:56 +0300 From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, Giovanni Trematerra <gianni@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: improve cx_lowest logic Message-ID: <CAL409Ky6qmeBUaTeCqrRcvYEH%2BgDUqqUgvpFiKSCt2d361j64g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FF95F79.30309@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FF95F79.30309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > I would like to propose the following change for review and testing: > http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi_cpu_cx_lowest.diff I just tested this on a laptop that jumps between reporting only C1, C1 and C2, and C1 through C3; in all cases your patch does the right thing, so this removes the need for kludges I had to do earlier; thank you, Andriy. Will you also change how /etc/rc.d/power_profile selects lowest_value? It currently uses the maximum from dev.cpu.0.cx_supported, but with your patch it'll be the right thing to simply use Cmax.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAL409Ky6qmeBUaTeCqrRcvYEH%2BgDUqqUgvpFiKSCt2d361j64g>